Why a Trust Factory (“think tank”)
The Objective of these works is to forge the cyber-physical, socioeconomic foundations for a “knowledge age” by building knowledge banking infrastructure and related technical ecosystems that act to support human agency & personhood, through infrastructure apparatus that is called an inforg.
This has the effect of addressing how our banking & legal systems were made as to uplift the operational mechanisms to support AI and the tooling required for knowledge economy.
This tooling incorporates considerations about the production & use of financial instruments, the need to ‘uplift’ traditional ‘open data’ works in a form i’ve called ‘permissive commons’ (some tech illustrations can be found here) and how this in-turn acts to address cyber & social security challenges whilst producing means to better support smart environments, development and decision making (nb: article also provides a few other use cases examples) alongside an array of opportunities throughout industry that are yet to be better articulated; whilst the means to produce curated events empowered by Hypermedia & an API that can be used by creative innovators, is amongst the things yet to be produced.
In-order to realise this potential knowledge economy ecosystem, there are a few ways through which it may be brought about. The fastest and easiest way would be for existing platform operators internationally; to make a few changes to the way they go about doing business, and provide relatively minor updates to their software; alongside the production of an array of developer documentation as to assist them to know how to use existing capabilities.
Another possibility is that an initiative that is produced out of countries that seek knowledge economy infrastructure without western worries, does so.
As the world is made-up of ~7.5Bn people, and Australia/NZ jointly have a small population by comparison; if it were to be done here, the consideration is that,
- We’d need to set-up a ‘think tank’ to go through and produce / refine the investment approach.
- We’d need to curate existing talent (noting there’s not many of them) to in-turn stimulate project creation & governance across all industries; strategically working with others to foster the strategic practice method employed; that would in-turn involve many stakeholders, to do so.
- We’d need to both support the needs of government (and key industries); alongside that of civilian stakeholders, in a format that seeks to produce an internationally scalable solution that is curated via application of shared values, interests and those relating to our biosphere and support for international trade.
Presently: We do not have the means to provide natural persons ‘inforgs’.
This is the most critical issue that must first be addressed. Whilst the practice method of doing so; can be undertaken in parallel to related works that do not in the first instance require ‘inforgs’ (or personal ‘identity’ / knowledge banking related infrastructure); the economics won’t work, without them.
Some works may be considered ‘unusual’ or worse. The conversations about quantum physics is amongst the highest of those aspects. What I have been led to consider; as is an example of causality (relating to a person who spends a great deal of time studying some type of concept, skillset, etc.) is that the human mind, our sense of consciousness as a natural person; is not formed simply by nature of physics and related considerations to the exclusion of quantum mechanically described (meaning field of science) attributes. What would otherwise be described as a ‘clock-work universe’, is considered to be a fundamentally flawed concept; and with respect to informatics systems, this impacts the way decisions are made about natural persons as a consequence of how information is collected, curated and made use of; as to influence, causality or moreover — life.
The purpose of an ‘inforg’ (as apposed to some set of ‘keys’ that by AI operated by corporate agents otherwise exclusively operating a knowledge equities market in isolation to natural persons, as are otherwise legal actors) is to address the way societal systems are able to maintain ‘kindness’ at a minimum. it is considered that without this, it’s impossible to positively impact our biosphere; as artificial agents don’t directly rely on it, other than as to provide resources that are available (at the lowest possible cost) to be consumed.
Moreover, as a consequence of absence of natural persons; systems become moreover, entirely insecure and unable to discern dissociative and distortive ‘informatics representations’ (information, as distinct to knowledge) of circumstantial events and applied / implied cost models.
When these issues are applied on an international basis; ‘rule of law’, is lost.
In-order to uplift our current circumstantial environment and the limitations placed upon decision makers today; required to make decisions based on the options that are available to them, pragmatically…
The objective is to establish a ‘public private partnership’ structure, that supports the means to figure out & manage a cyber-physical infrastructure project that is like previous real-world infrastructure projects (or projects such as those that led to man, walking on the moon);
Through a values based project alliance and curation team, able to support forge and foster a shared vision; and, the delivery of interoperable ecosystem components to make it work. As i have been working on this for 19 years and have played an instrumental role internationally in fostering the means to deliver the opportunity to do so, i want to be involved in finishing the job.
If interested; please get in touch via LinkedIn.
I am open to both local and international expressions of interest, whilst my preference would be to foster the means to first execute an AUS/NZ outcome.